Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Cuba Hoy: 'Cuba Before Fidel Castro'

Source:Cuba Hoy- from this 1950s film about Cuba.

"CUBA BEFORE FIDEL CASTRO" 

From Cuba Hoy 

This sounds like a propaganda film from the Bautista Regime that ran Cuba, before the Castro Communists took over the country through a military revolution in 1959. Cuba wasn't some thriving, liberal democracy and paradise of capitalism and private enterprise before Fidel Castro. But their urban areas and cities and the people who lived in those cities, were a lot better off under the Bautista's, then they became under Fidel Castro, who completely eliminated all capitalism and private enterprise, including local small businesses, when his regime came to power in 1959.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Hewad Patman: Fidel Castro (2011)

Source:Hewad Patman- from the 2011 film about Fidel Castro.

"Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz (Spanish: [fiˈðel ˈkastro]; born August 13, 1926) is a Cuban revolutionary and politician, having held the position of Prime Minister of Cuba from 1959 to 1976, and then President from 1976 to 2008. He also served as the First Secretary of the Communist Party of Cuba from the party's foundation in 1961 until 2011. Politically a Marxist-Leninist, under his administration the Republic of Cuba was converted into a one-party socialist state, with industry and business being nationalised under state ownership and socialist reforms implemented in all areas of society.

Born the illegitimate son of a wealthy farmer, Castro became involved in leftist anti-imperialist politics whilst studying law at the University of Havana. Subsequently involving himself in armed rebellions against right wing governments in the Dominican Republic and Colombia, he went on to conclude that the U.S.-backed Cuban President Fulgencio Batista, who was widely seen as a dictator, had to be overthrown; to this end he led a failed armed attack on the Moncada Barracks in 1953. Imprisoned for a year, he then traveled to Mexico, and with the aid of his brother Raúl Castro and friend Che Guevara, he assembled together a group of Cuban revolutionaries, the July 26 Movement. Returning with them to Cuba, he took a key role in the Cuban Revolution, leading a successful guerrilla war against Batista's forces, with Batista himself fleeing into exile in 1959.

Castro subsequently became Commander in Chief of the armed forces and shortly thereafter became Prime Minister. His involvement in the overthrow of Batista, as well as a suspected relationship with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, alarmed the United States, who through the CIA organised the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961 to overthrow his government, before proceeding to orchestrate repeated assassination attempts against him and implement an economic blockade of Cuba. To counter this threat, Castro forged an alliance with the Soviet Union and allowed them to store nuclear weapons on the island, leading to the events of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Adopting Marxism-Leninism as his guiding ideology, in 1961 Castro proclaimed the socialist nature of the Cuban revolution, and in 1965 became First Secretary of the newly founded Communist Party, with all other parties being abolished. He then led the transformation of Cuba into a socialist republic, nationalising industry and introducing free universal healthcare and education, as well as suppressing internal opposition. A keen internationalist, Castro then introduced Cuban medical brigades who worked throughout the developing world, and aided a number of foreign revolutionary socialist groups in the hope of toppling world capitalism.

In 1976 he became President of the Council of State as well as of the Council of Ministers. On the international stage, he held the post of Secretary-General of the Non-Aligned Movement from 1979 to 1983. Following the collapse of key ally the Soviet Union in 1991, Castro led Cuba into its economic "Special Period", before then taking the country into the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas in 2006 and forging economic and political alliances with other nations in the Latin American "Pink Tide". Amidst failing health, in 2006 Castro transferred his responsibilities to Vice-President Raúl Castro, who was then elected President when Fidel stepped down in 2008.

Castro is a controversial and highly divisive world figure, being lauded as a champion of anti-imperialism, humanitarianism, environmentalism and the world's poor by his supporters, but alternately his critics have accused him of being a dictator whose authoritarian administration has overseen multiple human rights abuses. Nonetheless, he has had a significant influence on the politics of a number of other world leaders, namely Nelson Mandela, Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales, and he is widely idolised by many leftists, socialists and anti-imperialists across the world." 


When Fidel Castro came to power in Cuba, he took over for a very corrupt an authoritarian dictator, but a country that had reached an economic level, where a lot of Cubans had some financial security. And President Castro took a lot of that away. He did eliminate a lot of the corruption from the Baustista Regime, but replaced it with heavy-handed, top-down, authoritarian Communist Rule. And the Cuban people have paid a heavy price for that ever since.

But what the Communist Republic of Cuba (as I call them) ave gotten in return is a quality educational and health care system (for a third-world country) that the Cuban people have benefited from, especially for a third-world country. But the problem is that even though, Cubans tend to be well-educated because the Castro Regime has messed up the Cuban economy so much with their state-ownership economic system, where the Cuban State at one point owned the entire Cuban economy, a lot of Cuban Workers can't find the good jobs that their level of education should give them. 

I get the fact that the Castro Revolutionaries wanted an independent Cuba that wouldn't be dependent on either America, Europe, Russia, or any country in Latin America, for their survival and perhaps they wanted to end the Cuba government corruption as well. But what they did was replace one authoritarian regime in the Bautista Regime from the 1950s, with another that's a lot worst off economically today, then where they were just 50 years ago. 

Friday, April 6, 2012

Associated Press: Mark Hamrick- 'US Economy Adds 120K Jobs, Jobless Rate at 8.2%'

Source:Associated Press- Governor Mitt Romney (Republican, Massachusetts) campaigning with U.S. Representative Paul Ryan (Republican, Wisconsin)

"Employers pulled back sharply on hiring last month, a reminder that the U.S. economy may not be growing fast enough to sustain robust job growth. The unemployment rate dipped, but mostly because more Americans stopped looking for work." 

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Brookings Institution: Daniel Kauffman- 'America's Benign Neglect Toward LAC?

Source:Daniel Kauffman- speaking to the Brookings Institution in Washington.

"Daniel Kaufmann: While Latin America has changed dramatically over the past decade, U.S. policy toward the region has not kept up. It is obvious that China is responding faster than the U.S. to these changes." 

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

VOA News: Jeff Swicord- 'Marijuana Grower Supply Store Opens in Washington DC'

Source:VOA News- Dick Kennedy was interviewed for this piece.

"Just a few kilometers from the US Capitol, and the seat of the US government, the nation's first franchise to sell supplies specifically for marijuana growers has opened another store. The opening of weGrow Washington DC coincides with the city's first steps to implement a law legalizing marijuana use to treat certain medical conditions. VOA's Jeff Swicord reports that medical marijuana has set off a battle between the 16 states that have passed such laws and federal law enforcement officials." 

From VOA News 

"Voice of America (VOA or VoA) is the state-owned international radio broadcaster of the United States of America. It is the largest[3] and oldest U.S.-funded international broadcaster.[4][5] VOA produces digital, TV, and radio content in 47 languages which it distributes to affiliate stations around the globe. It is primarily viewed by a non-American audience.

VOA was established in 1942,[6] and the VOA charter (Public Laws 94-350 and 103–415)[7] was signed into law in 1976 by President Gerald Ford.

VOA is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and overseen by the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), an independent agency of the U.S. government.[8] Funds are appropriated annually under the budget for embassies and consulates. In 2016, VOA broadcast an estimated 1,800 hours of radio and TV programming each week to approximately 236.6 million people worldwide with about 1,050 employees and a taxpayer-funded annual budget of US$218.5 million.[9][10]

While Voice of America is seen by some foreign listeners as having a positive impact,[11][12] others consider it to be a form of propaganda and a mouthpiece for the US government." 

From Wikipedia

Friday, March 30, 2012

Daily Worldwide News: 'Keith Olbermann Fired by CurrentTV'

Source:Daily Worldwide News- Keith Olbermann, time to go.
Source:The Daily Press 

"Keith Olbermann who was brought in to raise Current TV's ratings has done just the opposite and was fired today." 


To be honest you, I wasn’t shocked to hear that Keith Olbermann was fired by MSNBC a year ago. Even though they want to have a leftist prime time lineup. Giving voice to so-called American Progressives and looking at the news from a so-called progressive slant. 

MSNBC wants to be for so-called Progressives what FNC is for the right-wing. The rest of the NBC News operation I believe is fairly objective. And their reporting is solid. NBC Nightly News and NBC Meet the Press are excellent examples of this. 

But MSNBC Talk is clearly slanted towards so-calledProgressives. And Keith Olbermann is so far to the left, at least with his political commentary and anti-corporate if not private enterprise and so unafraid of offending anyone, including the people he works for (CurrentTV, owned by Al Gore) that he’ll say whatever he wants as long as he believes in it strong enough.

As much as Current my not want to be part of the corporate media and be part of the private sector version of PBS or something, they are part of corporate media. They are a business and have to turn a profit to be successful. 

CurrentTV has proven to not be the right format for Keith Olbermann. I’m not sure there is one, other than maybe HBO, Showtime or maybe PBS, where he could say whatever he wants to, swear as often as he likes. This is a format that’s served Bill Maher very well and if Keith can avoid offending one of these networks, maybe HBO, or Showtime, would be a place for him.

Keith, may fit in well there or going on talk radio. Starting his own website or news organization that reflects the views of so-called Progressives, (Democratic Socialists, really) because being the lead anchor on a cable network, which is what Current is and saying things that can offend corporate media, just doesn’t work, it doesn’t fit. 

Keith Olbermann needs to be on a format where he can be Keith and do his thing. And not have to worry about who he’s offending. Similar to Rush Limbaugh or Bill O’Reilly, but for leftists. And there may not be a big enough outlet out there that’s also willing to put up with Keith, that can make that happen for him. 

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Associated Press: Mark Sherman- 'Justices Vote Friday on Health Care Law'

Source:Associated Press- SCOTS corespondent Mark Sherman talking about the process that the Supreme Court uses to decide cases.

"While the rest of us have to wait until June, the justices of the Supreme Court will know the likely outcome of the historic health care case by the time they go home this weekend." 


Based on the arguments and the questioning that came from the Justices on Tuesday and Wednesday, I expect the individual mandate to go down and be ruled unconstitutional. Justice Kennedy didn't sound like a swing vote to me any point this week. And actually Chief Justice Roberts sound the most open minded of any of the Conservatives on the Supreme Court this week. But I wouldn't expect him to vote for the individual mandate. 

So assuming the individual mandate goes down (and I'm not ready to call it dead until its dead because I support it) the next Congress and perhaps next President (depending on who wins in 2012) will have to look at health care reform part 2 in the next Congress and what cab be done without an individual mandate.

So the question is without the individual mandate or the Medicaid prevision without the individual mandate, the rest of the Affordable Care Act doesn't mean much as far as controlling our health care costs. Because with the individual mandate, we are all forced as a country to cover our own share of our health care costs. And we can end a lot of uncompensated health care in America. And end up forcing people to cover others health care. Which will bring down the health care costs of everyone. 

So another question is with the ACA as it stands now but without the individual mandate, can the rest of the ACA stay in place and is it workable and is it even worth having. And I'm leaning towards no but without the ACA, we go back to square one with people being denied health insurance, just because they actually need it. And we go back to lifetime caps and we continue uncompensated health care in America. 

So I'm expecting a Black Friday tomorrow for the Affordable Care Act. I'm leaning towards the whole thing getting thrown out back to square one. Leaving it up to the next Congress to do deal with it, if anything. But of course I hope I'm wrong and we'll wait and see and I expect to be blogging about whatever the Supreme Court says tomorrow.

Liberal Democrat

Liberal Democrat
Liberal Democracy